A to Z Blogging Challenge: R, Re-Reading

speakI had to re-read Laurie Halse Anderson’s groundbreaking debut novel Speak because it was nominated for the ITR list.  Honestly, I  approached it with some of the committees’ comments in my mind – “Too old,” “really dated”, “female centered” etc. so I admit there was an audible sigh as I pulled the book from my stack on the end table and cracked it open.  Oh my.

Speak silenced me. Anderson is a master. I’m not even sure these other people were reading the same book!  Or had they, like me, read it years ago and simply assumed it was dated?

Melinda’s voice is absolutely authentic, Anderson’s storytelling is, frankly, exquisite – her plotting careful and truthful, the structure of the book is amazing, and the topic is sadly, still timely and important. I didn’t find this dated at all.  A few notable differences with today’s realistic fiction might be 1. no one’s carrying a cell phone so the book’s not artificially filled with characters’ text conversations (snark!) and 2. Melinda’s voice is so grounded, just so darn grounded, the novel has a layered texture that draws the reader in to Melinda’s world where we just sit it out with her over the course of the year.  Too many novels I’ve read lately employ an artificial time keeper and for me, it’s a distraction.  Books today are noisy and jagged and immature.  Ok, so call me a snob. I admit that!

It’s a wonderful moment when you find or re-discover a book that is truly timeless that continues to bless the reader with its lessons.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “A to Z Blogging Challenge: R, Re-Reading

  1. Bea

    WHAT! Man, Speak will always be one of the great YA books to me. It’s not *that* old but also like since when has that stopped other great books from being read? And why is “female-centered” a criticism?

    • wilabea94

      Frankly, I didn’t understand that comment either, and never followed up with the person who wrote that (as they wrote all the other reasons why it was old, outdated and shouldn’t be included) – I guess I already disagreed with her on so many points! Anyway, re-reading it was a glorious experience and I have no idea why I don’t own a copy!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s